THE PROBLEM:
There’s an elephant in the room, and we’ve been working around it for years. I’m talking about the “wild West” process of hiring a new adjuster. It’s a real problem. This difficulty of accurately assessing a prospective new-hire’s ability, and the lack of a viable, unbiased, meaningful measure of that competency has plagued the industry for decades.
Let’s take a look at the claims company’s point of view. When an adjusting firm hires a new adjuster, the company is making a serious investment (and assuming a genuine risk). An adjuster, even an Independent Adjuster, is considered a “fiduciary agent” of the insurance company itself, even if only contracted by the claims company. This position requiring this high level of trust is due to the fact that a breach of that trust can have such serious consequences. Simply put, if a claims company hires a bad adjuster, it can have significant repercussions.
Not long ago, we touched bases with a whole slew of the claims companies with whom we do business, and reached out to quite a few other claims companies as well. We were looking to not only keep our records up-to-date, but also to gain deeper insight into the hiring needs and practices of the independent adjusting industry as a whole. What we found was very interesting – buried under all sorts of “hiring requirements” is this bottom-line fact: employers desperately want assurance that a new hire will be able to perform. It’s as simple as that. But that’s huge. And “perform” doesn’t just mean being able to competently complete a claim. If, for instance, the adjuster has poor judgment, character issues or bad communication skills, he/she can throw the claims manager, the claims company and even the insurance company into a huge lawsuit that can cost millions or even lose the entire carrier account for the claims company!
In other words, claims companies finally don’t care if you are 21 or 81, male or female, brand-new or 40 years in the business. They need to maximize the risk of getting a performer and minimize the risk of getting a dud. So they do things that they don’t really want to do. Once such common hurdle is requiring new hires to have “a minimum of x years of experience”. In fact, a number of the companies we talked to now want verifiable proof of adjusting experience, via references or some other method, to weed out folks who merely say they have experience. They do this because the “experience requirement” is one of the only currently available litmus tests they know of to ensure the new hire has the necessary skills to do the job. Other avenues, such as mentor programs or other on-the-job training options have their own risks and involve significant costs and hassles. Claims companies almost universally confirm that they continually need new adjusters, and they know restrictive hiring guidelines costs them many highly-qualified newer adjusters. Yet because the cost of getting a “dud” adjuster is just too high – they simply must set up rigid hiring parameters.
This dilemma is at the heart of a ongoing discussion in the adjusting industry that goes all the way up the chain. Adjusters, independent claims companies, carriers, state governments, FEMA and the Federal Government have all been grappling with how to establish a meaningful, uniform means of establishing adjuster competency in order to protect claimants, while simultaneously maintaining the rights of all parties. Most everyone in the insurance adjusting industry acknowledges this serious deficiency and the need of a uniform, unbiased measurement of competency.
The establishment of a reliable, unbiased certification program is an issue we’ve been concerned about for years too. Core to our mission at AdjusterPro is providing the most immediately practical, usable and valuable training and licensing available to the claims adjuster nationwide; training that really prepares you for success in your career. So we’ve been looking for a way to allow our students to have their abilities measured side-by-side with everyone in the industry via a certification/testing program, thereby leveling the playing field and giving employers a truly fair and meaningful criterion for hiring.
THE SOLUTION
Well, the good news is that the heaviest hitters in the adjusting business – names like State Farm, All State, Pilot and more (see full list here) have taken this need quite seriously too, and have finally done something about it; the Property Technical Certification (PTC).
The really cool thing about the PTC is that it’s not the brainchild of some one claims company or handed down from a clueless governmental agency. It’s the fruit of years of hard work by some of the biggest players in the business, specifically designed to meet this one all-important need: a certification that sets a meaningful industry standard. The content is the result of top insurance company and claims company execs, claims managers and adjusters all pounding on this one question “what makes a good adjuster?”, then distilling it into a certification program. Where previous attempts have failed, the PTC has not. Nothing like this has been successfully done before, and it’s set to revolutionize the industry, finally taming the wild West.
What is the PTC?
A. The Property Technical Certification or PTC is an industry standardization that demonstrates that adjuster candidates are qualified when estimating property damages.
The PTC leads to adjuster development and recognition as well as improved job performance by:
- Increasing the hiring of properly trained property technical adjusters and qualified catastrophe technicians.
- Standardizing the required knowledge for handling property claims.
- Providing recruiters and vendor managers with insight into the technical capability of prospective employees and contractors.
- Improving the professionalism of property technical claim handling.
- Improving estimate accuracy, and intra-industry relations between service providor and adjuster.
Bottom line: The PTC addresses a glaring deficiency in the property claims industry by introducing a universal standard to recognize and measure the technical proficiency of individual claims adjusters.
A final note: the PTC not easy; passing it requires serious effort on the part of the student. But isn’t this just what’s needed, a real test of technical capability?
If you’re serious about your adjusting career, invest in yourself and get PTC Level I certified. Being ahead of the curve here will be a big advantage, because the PTC will soon be an industry standard.
Let us know how we can serve you and your Adjusting career!
Thank you,
- Adam
CEO, AdjusterPro, LLC